VANCOUVER, British Columbia Christopher Key knows exactly what he would be giving up if he left Bellingham, Washington.
"It's the sort of place Norman Rockwell would paint, where everyone watches out for everyone else and we have block parties every year," said Key, a 56-year-old Vietnam War veteran and former magazine editor who lists Francis Scott Key, who wrote "The Star-Spangled Banner," among his ancestors.
But leave it he intends to do, and as soon as he can. His house is on the market, and he is busily seeking work across the border in Canada. For him, the re-election of George W. Bush was the last straw.
"I love the United States," he said as he stood on the Vancouver waterfront, staring toward the Coastal Range, which was lost in a gray shroud. "I fought for it in Vietnam. It's a wrenching decision to think about leaving. But America is turning into a country very different from the one I grew up believing in."
In the Niagara of liberal angst just after Bush's victory on Nov. 2, the Canadian government's immigration Web site reported a surge in inquiries from the United States, to about 115,000 a day from 20,000.
After three months, memories of the election have begun to recede. There has been an inauguration, even a State of the Union address.
Yet immigration lawyers say that Americans are not just making inquiries and that more are pursuing a move above the 49th parallel, fed up with a country they see drifting persistently to the right and abandoning the principles of tolerance, compassion and peaceful idealism they felt once defined the nation.
America is in no danger of emptying out. But even a small loss of population, many from a deep sense of political despair, is a significant event in the life of a nation that thinks of itself as a place to escape to. Firm numbers on potential immigrants are elusive.
"The number of U.S. citizens who are actually submitting Canadian immigration papers and making concrete plans is about three or four times higher than normal," said Linda Mark, an immigration lawyer in Vancouver.
Other immigration lawyers in Toronto, Montreal and Halifax, Nova Scotia, said they had noticed a similar uptick, though most put the rise at closer to threefold.
"We're still not talking about a huge movement of people," said David Cohen, an immigration lawyer in Montreal. "In 2003, the last year where full statistics are available, there were something like 6,000 U.S. citizens who received permanent resident status in Canada. So even if we do go up threefold this year, we're only talking about 18,000 people."
Still, that is more than double the population of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. "For every one who reacts to the Bush victory by moving to a new country, how many others are there still in America, feeling similarly disaffected but not quite willing to take such a drastic step?" Cohen asked.
Melanie Redman, 30, assistant director of the Epilepsy Foundation in Seattle, said she had put her Volvo up for sale and hopes to be living in Toronto by the summer. She and her Canadian boyfriend, a Web site designer for Canadian nonprofit companies, had been planning to move to New York, but after Nov.2, they decided on Canada instead.
"I'm doing it," she said. "I don't want to participate in what this administration is doing here and around the world. Under Bush, the U.S. seems to be leading the pack as the world spirals down."
Redman intends to apply for a conjugal visa, which can be easier to get than the skilled worker visa that most Americans require. To do so, she must prove she and her boyfriend have had a relationship for at least a year, so she has collected supporting paperwork, like love letters, to present to the Canadian government.
"I'm originally from a poor, lead-mining town in Missouri, and I know a lot of the people there don't understand why I'm doing this," she said. "Even my family is pretty disappointed. And the fact is, it makes me pretty sad, too. But I just can't bear to pay taxes in the United States right now."
Compared with the other potential immigrants interviewed, Redman was far along in planning.
Mike Aves, 40, a financial planner in Palm Beach, Florida, where he has been active in the Young Democrats, said he was finding it almost impossible from that distance to land a job in Canada. "I've told my wife, I'd be willing to take a step down, socioeconomically, to move from white-collar work to a blue-collar job, if it would get us to Canada," he said.
Many of those interviewed said the idea of moving to Canada had been simmering in the backs of their minds for years, partly as a reaction to what they saw as a rightward drift in the United States and partly as a desire to live in a place they see as more tolerant, pacific and, yes, liberal. But for all, the re-election of Bush was decisive.
"Not everybody is prepared to live their political values, but these are people who are," said Jason Mogus, an Internet entrepreneur in Vancouver whose communicopia.net offers marketing services for progressive companies and nonprofit groups, and whose canadianalternative.com is often the first stop for Americans eager to learn about moving north.
"Immigration to Canada is not like packing your family in a car and moving across the state line," Mogus said. "It's a long process. It can take 18 months or even longer sometimes. And if you hire a lawyer to help you, it can cost thousands of dollars."
So Mogus said the response to the Web site, from all over the United States, had amazed him. Some are drawn by Canada's more tolerant attitude toward same-sex unions, he said, and there are a surprising number of middle-aged professionals.
"My wife and I have talked for a long time about perhaps retiring to a condo in downtown Vancouver," said Frederick Newmeyer, 61, a professor of linguistics at the University of Washington in Seattle. "But the election was the tipping point."
I support an individual's right of support a candidate as they see fit. In our political system, there is a winner and a loser. As dissatisfying as it can be, it's still the best political system the world has yet to offer.
In California, I'm often confronted with voting with the losing candidate, but it hasn't driven me away. If anything, it has made me more steadfast in my beliefs and more adamant to express my views. But I've not once considered running away, leaving California for a Red State. For someone to cut and run because President Bush was rightfully elected to a second term is akin to the boy who cries that he is taking his ball and going home, bringing an end to the game.
For those of you wishing to contact the above-mentioned sore losers, feel free to contact them and bid them adeiu. (Info on found on the web -- people who live in glass internets shouldn't throw stones.)
Fritz - the recreant professor
Frederick Newmeyer
E-mail: fjn@u.washington.edu
Telephone: 206-543-2046
Christopher Key
E-Mail: kievc2@comcast.net
Telephone: (360) 756-1058
Mike Aves
E-mail: maves@leapfroginet.com
Telephone: 516-439-2660
Melanie Redman
E-mail: mredman@epilepsynw.org
Telephone: 206-547-4551 ext. 103

4 comments:
TM, you seem like a practical person. You want to make change in the world but you're not some pie in the sky idealist. You want to see change in your lifetime so you choose your battles accordingly.
I think that's reasonable.
You choose to do your work in California, (it seems from your posts) where you you feel you can make the Democratic party a more mainstream and more electable entity than you consider it to be now.
While I might disagree with that viewpoint, I don't take issue with your decision to do what you do. I pick my battles too.
Why can't you afford these people you call "sore losers" the same respect?
Why do you encourage others to invade their privacy and pollute their inboxes with typed abuse?
I used to hear pro-adminstration types say: "America, love it or leave it." Now, apparently, it's not even acceptable to leave it.
After seeing your blog entry I'm all the more certain these folks are actually "strategic fighters" who've made the right decision.
Reply to Chris:
So - You're telling me that outright retreat, abandoning your country and fleeing to a foreign shore, is strategic fighting? (sic).
That's a P.C. term I hadn't heard before. I guess in the first gulf war, Saddam engaged in "strategic fighting," unoccupying Kuwait. . .
tm
Wow. Maybe I need to get a web counter. My lil' ol blog sure seems to be getting some attention over this post.
All I did was suggest that people contact the four folks listed below and say farewell. Hardly a contemptuous thing to do. . .
tm
Gee Phil. . . Am I not responding to these comments? I click on your link and I don't find a direct e-mail to you.
tm
Post a Comment